PhD Defense by Didem Pehlivanoglu

Event Details
  • Date/Time:
    • Monday August 13, 2018
      11:00 am - 1:00 pm
  • Location: : J.S. Coon bldg. room 148
  • Phone:
  • URL:
  • Email:
  • Fee(s):
    N/A
  • Extras:
Contact
No contact information submitted.
Summaries

Summary Sentence: Age-related Differences in Selective Attention to Emotional Material:Does Task Relevance Matter?

Full Summary: No summary paragraph submitted.

Name: Didem Pehlivanoglu

School of Psychology Ph.D. Dissertation Defense Meeting

Date: Monday, August 13th, 2018

Time: 11:00 am

Location: J.S. Coon bldg. room 148

 

Advisor: 

Paul Verhaeghen, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)

 

Dissertation Committee Members:

Audrey Duarte, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)

Christopher Hertzog, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)

Mark Wheeler, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)

Derek Isaacowitz, Ph.D. (Northeastern University)

 

Title: Age-related Differences in Selective Attention to Emotional Material: 

Does Task Relevance Matter?

 

Summary: According to the inhibitory deficit hypothesis, older adults have difficulties in preventing task-irrelevant materials from gaining access to working memory (Lustig, Hasher, & Zacks, 2007). Some neuroscientific evidence, however, show that the age-related inhibitory deficit disappears when task difficulty is equated.  Thus, it is still not clear whether findings regarding the age-related inhibitory deficit are confounded by task-related factors or not.  Additionally, although previous studies employing event-related potentials (ERPs) showed that processing of emotional stimuli depends on the availability of attentional resources in the young, it is still an open question whether there are age-related differences in the amount to which processing of emotional material depends on available resources and if so, how processing of emotional material changes as a function of age and task relevancy. Combining these questions, the goal of this dissertation was to examine the effect of age on ERP correlates of inhibitory functioning by employing a selective attention task which required younger and older adults to selectively attend to either pictures (emotional or non-emotional) or to flanking line bars, concurrently presented on the screen. In the picture task, participants decided whether the picture was presented in black and white or color; in the bar task, they indicated whether the orientation of the bars matched or not. Prior to the experiment, I individually calibrated the difficulty of the non-emotional bar task such that accuracy was 75% correct. The behavioral data showed no interference from emotional material in the bar task. Accuracy in the picture task was higher for emotional relative to neutral pictures in the picture task, regardless of age. ERPs provided evidence for both emotion-based and more differentiated valence-based processing for the younger adult group in the picture task. In the bar task, there was evidence for processing of task-irrelevant emotional distractors during the time windows (250-300 ms and 350-450 ms) associated with the negative ERP components, but this intrusion was not found in the positive component which appeared at a later stage of processing (500-700 ms). ERP results for the older adult group provided evidence for an emotional positivity effect and an emotional negativity effect in the picture task. In the bar task, although interference from positive images occurred at early stage of processing, emotional and neutral pictures were processed at the same level at later stages of processing. These findings are discussed in light of theories of cognitive aging and different accounts of emotional processing in aging. 

Additional Information

In Campus Calendar
No
Groups

Graduate Education and Faculty Development

Invited Audience
Faculty/Staff, Public, Graduate students, Undergraduate students
Categories
Other/Miscellaneous
Keywords
Phd Defense
Status
  • Created By: Tatianna Richardson
  • Workflow Status: Published
  • Created On: Aug 1, 2018 - 2:32pm
  • Last Updated: Aug 1, 2018 - 2:33pm