<node id="692375">
  <nid>692375</nid>
  <type>event</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27707"><![CDATA[27707]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1788877646</created>
  <changed>1788877677</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[PhD Proposal by Yu Wei]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title:</strong>
Characterizing Differential Privacy: Analytical and Black-Box Approaches</p><p><strong>Date</strong>:
September
11 (Friday)</p><p><strong>Time:</strong>10am - 12 pm EST</p><p><strong>Location</strong>:
(In-person)
Coda C1008 Bolton</p><p>(Virtual)
<a href="https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/263011129320082?p=eWNP2XKBitnUg9s34M">https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/263011129320082?p=eWNP2XKBitnUg9s34M</a></p><p><strong>Yu
Wei</strong><br>Ph.D. Student -&nbsp;School of Cybersecurity and Privacy<br>Georgia Institute of Technology</p><p><strong>Committee
Members</strong><br>Dr. Vassilis Zikas
(Advisor) - School of Cybersecurity and Privacy, Georgia Institute of Technology<br>Dr. Vladimir Kolesnikov - School of Cybersecurity and
Privacy, Georgia Institute of Technology<br>Dr. Teodora Baluta - School of Cybersecurity and Privacy,
Georgia Institute of Technology<br>Dr. Alex Ozdemir - School of Cybersecurity and Privacy,
Georgia Institute of Technology</p><p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>Differential
privacy provides a rigorous framework for controlling how much the behavior of
a randomized computation can change when an individual’s data changes. Yet
understanding and deploying differentially private computations raises several
fundamental questions: How private is a given computation? Can we design
computations with better privacy–utility tradeoffs? And can we verify that a
realized computation actually satisfies its claimed privacy guarantee?</p><p><strong>This
dissertation approaches these questions by interpreting differential privacy
through the lens of indistinguishability.</strong>
Rather than working with a single representation, I characterize this
indistinguishability through different views and reductions that make the
related privacy questions tractable. These characterizations lead to two
complementary approaches. In the&nbsp;<strong>black-box approach</strong>, I reason from samples of a computation’s observed
outputs, using classification and hypothesis testing to estimate and audit its
indistinguishability. This line of work develops from black-box estimation of
(epsilon, delta)-privacy, to estimation/auditing of the full f-DP curve, to
sequential and one-run privacy auditing.</p><p>The
second is an&nbsp;<strong>analytical approach</strong>, which exploits
distributional structure in the observer’s view to derive tractable
characterizations of indistinguishability. I study computations whose
observable outputs are Gaussian and develop tools for characterizing their
differential privacy guarantees, enabling both privacy analysis and mechanism
design. Building on this perspective, I also study additive-noise mechanisms,
establishing the asymptotic optimality of Gaussian noise among additive-noise
mechanisms in high dimensions and designing improved mechanisms in low
dimensions.</p><p>Together,
this dissertation develops a methodology for studying differential privacy as
an indistinguishability notion: characterize indistinguishability through
different views, and use the resulting characterizations to address the three
fundamental problems in differentially private computations.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></body>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Characterizing Differential Privacy: Analytical and Black-Box Approaches]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p>Characterizing Differential Privacy: Analytical and Black-Box Approaches</p>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_time>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[2026-09-11T10:00:00-04:00]]></value>
      <value2><![CDATA[2026-09-11T12:00:00-04:00]]></value2>
      <rrule><![CDATA[]]></rrule>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_time>
  <field_fee>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_fee>
  <field_extras>
      </field_extras>
  <field_audience>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Public]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_audience>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Coda C1008 Bolton]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_phone>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_phone>
  <field_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
            <attributes><![CDATA[]]></attributes>
    </item>
  </field_url>
  <field_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_email>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>221981</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Graduate Studies]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>1788</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Other/Miscellaneous]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>102851</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Phd proposal]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
