<node id="690225">
  <nid>690225</nid>
  <type>event</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27707"><![CDATA[27707]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1778515123</created>
  <changed>1778515162</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[PhD Proposal by Johnathan Corbin]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title:</strong>&nbsp;Formulating Multi-Agent Safety-Critical Control as a Feasible Resource Allocation Problem</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Date:&nbsp;</strong>Friday May 15th, 2026</p><p><strong>Time:&nbsp;</strong>1:00pm - 2:00pm&nbsp;ET</p><p><strong>Location:&nbsp;</strong>Guggenheim 244</p><p><strong>Virtual:&nbsp;</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/295530221364067?p=XAsX2uMHAJ40THTLPb" target="_blank" title="Meeting join">https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/295530221364067?p=XAsX2uMHAJ40THTLPb</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Johnathan Corbin</strong></p><p>Robotics Ph.D. Student</p><p>Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering</p><p>Georgia Institute of Technology</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Committee:</strong></p><p>Dr. Jonathan Rogers (Advisor)</p><p>Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering</p><p>Georgia Institute of Technology</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Dr. Sarah H. Q. Li</p><p>Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering</p><p>Georgia Institute of Technology</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Dr. Anirban Mazumdar</p><p>George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering</p><p>Georgia Institute of Technology&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Dr. Matthew Hale</p><p>School of Electrical and Computer Engineering</p><p>Georgia Institute of Technology</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Dr. Sean Wilson</p><p>Robotics and Autonomous Systems Division</p><p>Georgia Tech Research Institute</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p><p>In heterogeneous multi-agent systems, ensuring safety requires two distinct decisions. The first is determining what corrective action is needed. The second is assigning which agents should take it. Standard control barrier function (CBF) formulations combine these into a single centralized quadratic program, distributing corrective effort by geometric proximity with no regard for agent capability, privacy, or accumulated burden. This can cause actuator-limited agents to be unable to maintain safety and makes it difficult to adjust how responsibility is allocated to agents.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This proposal reformulates multi-agent safety-critical control as a feasible resource allocation problem through a two-stage architecture. The first stage compresses multi-constraint safety into a single, dynamically feasible "safety deficit" using integral augmentation, log-sum-exponential composition, and optimal-decay CBFs. The second stage introduces "avoidance credit," an allocable resource that decouples the physics of safety from the economics of effort distribution through a modular interface. The interface admits any allocation mechanism satisfying a small set of conditions, enabling properties such as agent privacy and long-horizon fairness. As long as the allocation satisfies these conditions, the system is guaranteed to maintain safety within the actuator limits of the agents.</p>]]></body>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Formulating Multi-Agent Safety-Critical Control as a Feasible Resource Allocation Problem]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p>Formulating Multi-Agent Safety-Critical Control as a Feasible Resource Allocation Problem</p>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_time>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[2026-05-15T13:00:00-04:00]]></value>
      <value2><![CDATA[2026-05-15T14:00:00-04:00]]></value2>
      <rrule><![CDATA[]]></rrule>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_time>
  <field_fee>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_fee>
  <field_extras>
      </field_extras>
  <field_audience>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Public]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_audience>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Guggenheim 244]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_phone>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_phone>
  <field_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
            <attributes><![CDATA[]]></attributes>
    </item>
  </field_url>
  <field_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_email>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>221981</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Graduate Studies]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>1788</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Other/Miscellaneous]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>102851</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Phd proposal]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
