<node id="688992">
  <nid>688992</nid>
  <type>event</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27707"><![CDATA[27707]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1773772573</created>
  <changed>1773772611</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[PhD Defene by MATTHEW L. PHILLIPS]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p>School of Civil and Environmental Engineering</p><p>Ph.D. Thesis Defense Announcement</p><p>EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE WELD REPAIRS ON A709 STEELS</p><p><strong>By</strong>&nbsp;MATTHEW L. PHILLIPS</p><p><strong>Advisor</strong>:</p><p>DR. RYAN J. SHERMAN</p><p><strong>Committee Members:</strong>&nbsp;DR. DONALD WHITE (CEE), DR. LAUREN STEWART (CEE), DR. EDVARD BRUUN (CEE), DR. SHUMAN XIA (ME)</p><p><strong>Date and Time:</strong>&nbsp;March 30, 2026. 2pm EST Location: SEB 122 / Virtual Link</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>ABSTRACT<br>Welding is used extensively throughout steel bridge fabrication. Considerable care<br>is taken to ensure the welds are sound, but rejectable defects are occasionally<br>identified during fabrication and must be repaired, with some requiring multiple<br>repair attempts to resolve. Currently, there is no limit on the number of repair welds<br>allowed before a member is rejected, leading to concerns about the behavior and<br>longevity of repaired joints and potentially costly disputes between owners and<br>fabricators over the acceptance or rejection of members containing repaired joints.<br>The objective of the current study is to determine the effects of multiple weld repairs<br>on the material properties and fatigue life of complete joint penetration (CJP)<br>welded joints made from A709 Grades 50W and HPS70W steels. An experimental<br>program comprising material characterization and fatigue testing has been<br>developed to accomplish the objective. Material characterization tests were<br>conducted on plate specimens that were welded and repaired between zero and five<br>times. Large-scale flexural fatigue tests were conducted on built-up members with<br>3/4" and 1-1/2" thick flanges that have multiple butt-splice CJP welds that have been repaired between zero and five times. The material characterization tests showed<br>that the number of weld repairs has little effect on the ductility, yield/tensile strength,<br>and impact energy of the joint, with all joints meeting the strength requirements of<br>the steel bridge industry. The fatigue tests showed no discernible trend between the<br>fatigue life of the joint and the number of weld repairs, and all joints met or exceeded<br>the design-life predictions from AASHTO and displayed scatter similar to that<br>observed in historical data. Ultimately, the findings from this dissertation indicate<br>that no repair weld limits should be imposed for material property or fatigue life<br>concerns; however, repair weld limits required for quality control purposes should<br>still be considered.</p>]]></body>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE WELD REPAIRS ON A709 STEELS]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p>EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE WELD REPAIRS ON A709 STEELS</p>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_time>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[2026-03-30T14:00:00-04:00]]></value>
      <value2><![CDATA[2026-03-30T16:00:00-04:00]]></value2>
      <rrule><![CDATA[]]></rrule>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_time>
  <field_fee>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_fee>
  <field_extras>
      </field_extras>
  <field_audience>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Public]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_audience>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[SEB 122 / Virtual Link]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_phone>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_phone>
  <field_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
            <attributes><![CDATA[]]></attributes>
    </item>
  </field_url>
  <field_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_email>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>221981</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Graduate Studies]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>1788</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Other/Miscellaneous]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>100811</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Phd Defense]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
