{"687820":{"#nid":"687820","#data":{"type":"news","title":"Confronting the Roadblocks in Medical Technology Innovation","body":[{"value":"\u003Cp\u003EGeorgia Tech\u2019s \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/matter-systems.gatech.edu\/\u0022\u003EInstitute for Matter and Systems\u003C\/a\u003E (IMS) hosted its second Boundaries and Breakthroughs panel on Jan. 27, bringing together leading clinicians, engineers, and data experts to examine why\u0026nbsp;promising medical technologies often fail to translate into clinical practice.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EModerated by IMS Executive Director \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/matter-systems.gatech.edu\/people\/eric-vogel\u0022\u003EEric Vogel\u003C\/a\u003E, the panel explored how innovation, regulation, economics and clinical realities intersect to shape the future of medical devices.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EThe panel featured \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/people.research.gatech.edu\/node\/17689\u0022\u003EJon Duke\u003C\/a\u003E, physician and director of the Center for Health Analytics and Informatics at Georgia Tech Research Institute; \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/ece.gatech.edu\/directory\/matthew-t-flavin\u0022\u003EMatthew Flavin\u003C\/a\u003E, assistant professor in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/www.cc.gatech.edu\/people\/hyunjoo-oh\u0022\u003EHyunJoo Oh\u003C\/a\u003E, assistant professor in the schools of Industrial Design and Interactive Computing; and \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/med.emory.edu\/departments\/pediatrics\/divisions\/pulmonary\/profile\/?u=LGUGLAN\u0022\u003ELokesh Guglani\u003C\/a\u003E, pediatric pulmonologist and clinician-researcher at Children\u2019s Healthcare of Atlanta.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EVogel opened the event by highlighting the gap between technological novelty and real-world medical adoption.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u201cAbout 75% of medical device start-ups never achieve commercial success or make it to market, and some industry estimates push this higher,\u201d Vogel said. \u201cEven those that reach the market often fail to gain meaningful adoption. This may be because technologists optimize for platforms five or 10 years out and are rewarded by novelty, whereas clinicians demand reliability, interpretability, and outcomes that hold up with real patients, real workflows, and real liability.\u201d\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EThroughout the discussion, panelists examined the balance between rapid innovation and clinical safety, noting that the level of invasiveness often determines how bold developers can be.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u201cWe must remember that in medicine\u2014and especially when we\u0027re dealing with human lives\u2014there\u0027s a significant asymmetry of the harm that could be done,\u201d said Guglani. \u201cEven a small change or an oversight at the design level of a medical device can have significant downstream repercussions for patients and create liability for institutions and providers.\u201d\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EFlavin and Duke added that excessive conservatism, particularly around non-invasive wearable, can also slow potentially life-changing advancements.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EAll panelists agreed that breakthrough technology alone is not enough to ensure clinical adoption. Usability, workflow fit, and time efficiency often determine whether clinicians adopt a device. Tools that require lengthy calibration or add to a clinician\u2019s already tight schedule rarely succeed. Even when a technology integrates well, reimbursement barriers can prevent adoption.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u201cA lot of technologies come out, but then if the clinic is using them and is not being reimbursed for the time spent, that creates a bottleneck,\u201d said Guglani.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EEconomic constraints also shape who benefits from innovation. Children with rare diseases, stroke survivors, and other small or heterogeneous patient groups often struggle to attract investors, even when their needs are urgent.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EThe panelists also discussed the dual role of regulatory and manufacturing standards. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements ensures consistent, safe production, but force teams to lock designs earlier than ideal, adding cost and slowing iteration. These requirements protect patients but also function as an economic filter for many early-stage technologies.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EThe conversation then turned to data, AI, and the education of future innovators. Despite massive amounts of health data, many clinically important areas remain data\u2011scarce. Wearable devices, such as smart watches, may help close these gaps, but AI models remain limited by the quality of input data.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EWhen asked about preparing the next generation of MedTech innovators, panelists emphasized the importance of \u201cinterface literacy\u201d or the ability to collaborate across disciplinary boundaries and understand how design decisions cascade into real clinical environments. \u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u201cYou really do have to be able to be interdisciplinary,\u201d said Duke. \u201cNow of course what makes things go is not often the knowledge of the domain, but the person\u2019s role or connectivity into the system.\u201d\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EVogel closed by emphasizing that successful medical technology development requires \u201congoing, honest collaboration\u201d across fields. The Boundaries and Breakthroughs series will continue that mission in February with a panel on the future of the electric grid.\u003C\/p\u003E","summary":"","format":"limited_html"}],"field_subtitle":"","field_summary":[{"value":"\u003Cp\u003EClinicians and researchers outlined why breakthrough devices often fall short in clinical settings and emphasized the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and practical workflow integration.\u003C\/p\u003E","format":"limited_html"}],"field_summary_sentence":[{"value":"Clinicians and researchers outlined why breakthrough devices often fall short in clinical settings and emphasized the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and practical workflow integration."}],"uid":"35272","created_gmt":"2026-01-29 16:04:43","changed_gmt":"2026-02-16 15:15:01","author":"aneumeister3","boilerplate_text":"","field_publication":"","field_article_url":"","location":"Atlanta, GA","dateline":{"date":"2026-01-29T00:00:00-05:00","iso_date":"2026-01-29T00:00:00-05:00","tz":"America\/New_York"},"extras":[],"hg_media":{"679124":{"id":"679124","type":"image","title":"Bioelectronics and MedTech panel","body":null,"created":"1769700549","gmt_created":"2026-01-29 15:29:09","changed":"1769700715","gmt_changed":"2026-01-29 15:31:55","alt":"A panel of five speakers sits on tall stools at the front of a classroom, participating in a moderated discussion. The moderator on the left holds papers while addressing the group. A large presentation slide behind the panel displays names and academic titles. Audience members are partially visible in the foreground, and tables, chairs, and a water bottle are arranged throughout the room.","file":{"fid":"263245","name":"bioelectronics_and_medTech_panel.jpg","image_path":"\/sites\/default\/files\/2026\/01\/29\/bioelectronics_and_medTech_panel.jpg","image_full_path":"http:\/\/hg.gatech.edu\/\/sites\/default\/files\/2026\/01\/29\/bioelectronics_and_medTech_panel.jpg","mime":"image\/jpeg","size":668931,"path_740":"http:\/\/hg.gatech.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/styles\/740xx_scale\/public\/2026\/01\/29\/bioelectronics_and_medTech_panel.jpg?itok=C-PG3Fe5"}}},"media_ids":["679124"],"groups":[{"id":"660369","name":"Matter and Systems"},{"id":"1188","name":"Research Horizons"}],"categories":[],"keywords":[{"id":"187915","name":"go-researchnews"},{"id":"187423","name":"go-bio"},{"id":"172970","name":"go-neuro"}],"core_research_areas":[{"id":"39441","name":"Bioengineering and Bioscience"},{"id":"193652","name":"Matter and Systems"}],"news_room_topics":[],"event_categories":[],"invited_audience":[],"affiliations":[],"classification":[],"areas_of_expertise":[],"news_and_recent_appearances":[],"phone":[],"contact":[{"value":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Ca href=\u0022mailto:amelia.neumeister@research.gatech.edu\u0022\u003EAmelia Neumeister\u003C\/a\u003E | Communications Program Manager\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EThe Institute for Matter and Systems\u003C\/p\u003E","format":"limited_html"}],"email":["amelia.neumeister@research.gatech.edu"],"slides":[],"orientation":[],"userdata":""}}}