<node id="682388">
  <nid>682388</nid>
  <type>event</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27707"><![CDATA[27707]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1747147460</created>
  <changed>1747147493</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[PhD Defense by Candas Oner]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p>School of Civil and Environmental Engineering</p><p>Ph.D. Thesis Defense Announcement</p><p>MODELLING BASED DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF SPIDER-WEB INSPIRED GEOGRIDS IN COMPOSITE GEOMATERIAL SYSTEMS</p><p>By Candas Oner</p><p>Advisor:</p><p>Dr. J. David Frost</p><p>Committee Members: Dr. Fernando Patino-Ramirez (CEE), Dr. Rodrigo Borela Valente (SCI), Dr. Michael E. Helms (ME), Dr. Mark H. Wayne (Tensar), Dr. Jason T. DeJong (CEE/UC Davis)</p><p>Date and Time: May 28, 2025. 2:00pm</p><p>Location: SEB 122</p><p>Microsoft Teams Meeting ID: 273 217 231 733; Passcode: pe6Vd7Yj</p><p>Complete announcement, with abstract, is attached.</p><p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong><br>Geogrid reinforcement is typically used to stabilize the soil, both by interlocking soil<br>particles and by providing lateral restraint. These planar geogrid structures are used<br>in numerous different geotechnical engineering applications, such as pavements,<br>retaining walls, foundations, and encapsulation of stone columns. Spider-Web<br>Inspired Geogrids are a concept that attempts to enhance and optimize the design<br>of polymeric geogrid structures for ground reinforcement.<br>In 2019, researchers at Georgia Tech began exploring the opportunities for new<br>geometric configurations of geogrids. Based on inspiration from spider webs, these<br>studies identified, early on, the characteristics of spider webs that could be<br>beneficial to their performance, including different aperture sizes and continuous<br>Georgia Institute of Technology<br>School of Civil and Environmental Engineering<br>Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0355 U.S.A.<br>Phone: 404.894.9044<br>A Unit of the University System of Georgia • An Equal Education and Employment Opportunity Institution<br>radial elements, amongst others. The resulting geogrid structures are referred to by<br>the name SpiderAx throughout this study.<br>The three main features of SpiderAx geogrids are a stiff/condensed center region, a<br>large number of radial members, and the unique shapes created by the intersection<br>of those radial members with concentric chords. This added complexity to the<br>geogrid design from bio-inspiration comes with the question of how to integrate the<br>resulting ‘unit-cell’ spider-web inspired structures into a larger structure. This study<br>uses structural optimization concepts to optimize and enable the integration of<br>those initial unit-cell structures. Different numerical methods are employed to test<br>the effectiveness of these optimized structures. To test its structural properties,<br>such as its behavior under compressive and shear loading, the Finite Element<br>Method is used. A coupled approach between the Finite Difference Method and the<br>Discrete Element Method is utilized to evaluate the stabilization effect of geogrids<br>on natural aggregate systems under varying boundary conditions.<br>According to the results of the analyses performed with the Finite Element Method,<br>the total normalized strain energy stored in SpiderAx is less than for other geogrid<br>configurations, which is related to the stiffer geogrid behavior. This baseline case is<br>then elaborated with different parametric analyses, including different node and rib<br>dimensions, eccentric loading conditions for the plate load testing, and shearing<br>orientation and the initial surcharge pressure for interface shear testing. In optimal<br>forms, it is demonstrated that SpiderAx configurations can lead to both economic<br>and mechanical advantages.<br>Later in the thesis, the engineering performance of the geogrid is investigated with<br>the reverse approach, meaning that the influence of the geogrid on the stabilization<br>of the soil is analyzed. The influence of different parameters such as geogrid<br>stiffness, boundary conditions, loading plate diameter, geogrid thickness, clump<br>size, and clump aspect ratio are studied. It is shown that while the increase in the<br>geogrid thickness and geogrid stiffness lead to better performance in terms of<br>surface rutting, increase in the loading plate diameter hinders the ability of the<br>geogrid to stabilize the soil in the simulations. It is also illustrated that in order to<br>investigate the clump size and aspect ratio, a combined analysis with the geogrid<br>aperture should be performed, because it is found that the compatibility between<br>those can influence the benefits of using geogrids.</p>]]></body>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[MODELLING BASED DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF SPIDER-WEB INSPIRED GEOGRIDS IN COMPOSITE GEOMATERIAL SYSTEMS]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p>MODELLING BASED DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF SPIDER-WEB INSPIRED<br>GEOGRIDS IN COMPOSITE GEOMATERIAL SYSTEMS</p>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_time>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[2025-05-28T14:00:00-04:00]]></value>
      <value2><![CDATA[2025-05-28T16:00:00-04:00]]></value2>
      <rrule><![CDATA[]]></rrule>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_time>
  <field_fee>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_fee>
  <field_extras>
      </field_extras>
  <field_audience>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Public]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_audience>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[SEB 122]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_phone>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_phone>
  <field_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
            <attributes><![CDATA[]]></attributes>
    </item>
  </field_url>
  <field_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_email>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>221981</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Graduate Studies]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>1788</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Other/Miscellaneous]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>100811</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Phd Defense]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
