<node id="674576">
  <nid>674576</nid>
  <type>external_news</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="36583"><![CDATA[36583]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1715116600</created>
  <changed>1715263893</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[The Mystery of the Missing Multicellular Prokaryotes]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p>In a recent paper in the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2319840121"><em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://biosciences.gatech.edu/">School of Biological Sciences</a>&nbsp;Associate Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://biosciences.gatech.edu/people/will-ratcliff">William Ratcliff</a>&nbsp;and Emma Bingham, student in the&nbsp;<a href="https://qbios.gatech.edu/">Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Quantitative Biosciences</a>,&nbsp;put forward a brand new idea, which they tested in a computational model. Bingham and Ratcliff suggest that the way prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes respond to population size may make or break their chances of evolving multicellularity. It’s a fascinating hypothesis, and if further work bears it out, it could fundamentally change how scientists conceive of this transition and challenge a key assumption they make about evolutionary forces.</p>
]]></body>
  <field_article_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-mystery-of-the-missing-multicellular-prokaryotes-20240502/]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
    </item>
  </field_article_url>
  <field_publication>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[ Quanta Magazine  ]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_publication>
  <field_dateline>
    <item>
      <value>2024-05-02</value>
      <timezone></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_dateline>
  <field_media>
        </field_media>
  <og_groups>
          <item>1278</item>
          <item>1275</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[College of Sciences]]></item>
          <item><![CDATA[School of Biological Sciences]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
    <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
