<node id="624351">
  <nid>624351</nid>
  <type>news</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="35061"><![CDATA[35061]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1565623870</created>
  <changed>1565641352</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[Manipulating the Visibility of Barriers to Improve Spatial Navigation Efficiency and Cognitive Mapping ]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48098-0"><em>Manipulating the Visibility of Barriers to Improve Spatial Navigation Efficiency and Cognitive Mapping</em></a></p>

<p>Qiliang He, Timothy P. McNamara, Thackery Brown</p>

<p>Previous studies from psychology, neuroscience and geography showed that environmental barriers fragment the representation of the environment, reduce spatial navigation efficiency, distort distance estimation and make spatial updating difficult. Despite these negative effects, limited research has examined how to overcome barriers and if individual differences mediate their causes and potential interventions. We hypothesize that the reduced visibility caused by barriers plays a major role in accumulating error in spatial updating and encoding spatial relationships. We tested this using virtual navigation to grant participants &lsquo;X-ray&rsquo; vision during environment encoding (i.e., barriers become translucent) and quantifying cognitive mapping benefits of counteracting fragmented visibility. We found that compared to the participants trained with naturalistic environment visibility, participants trained in the translucent environment had better performance in wayfinding and pointing tasks, which are theorized to measure navigation efficiency and cognitive mapping. Interestingly, these benefits were only observed in participants with high self-report sense of direction. Together, our results provide important insight into (1) how perceptual barrier effects manifest, even when physical fragmentation of space is held constant, (2) establish a novel intervention that can improve spatial learning, and (3) provide evidence that individual differences modulate perceptual barrier effects and the efficacy of such interventions.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48098-0"><em>Scientific Reports, </em><strong>volume&nbsp;9</strong>, Article&nbsp;number:&nbsp;11567&nbsp;(2019) </a></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></body>
  <field_subtitle>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[School of Psychology Post Doctoral Fellow, Qiliang He, published in Scientific Reports ]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_subtitle>
  <field_dateline>
    <item>
      <value>2019-08-12T00:00:00-04:00</value>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_dateline>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Can we improve cognitive mapping with virtual reality?]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;Can we improve cognitive mapping with virtual reality? Environmental barrier visibility is a big factor, and a good target &ndash; at least for people with the right psychological traits&rdquo;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_media>
          <item>
        <nid>
          <node id="624352">
            <nid>624352</nid>
            <type>image</type>
            <title><![CDATA[Scientific Reports Image]]></title>
            <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
                          <field_image>
                <item>
                  <fid>237749</fid>
                  <filename><![CDATA[Scientific Reports-8-12-19.webp_.png]]></filename>
                  <filepath><![CDATA[/sites/default/files/images/Scientific%20Reports-8-12-19.webp_.png]]></filepath>
                  <file_full_path><![CDATA[http://hg.gatech.edu//sites/default/files/images/Scientific%20Reports-8-12-19.webp_.png]]></file_full_path>
                  <filemime>image/png</filemime>
                  <image_740><![CDATA[]]></image_740>
                  <image_alt><![CDATA[]]></image_alt>
                </item>
              </field_image>
            
                      </node>
        </nid>
      </item>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_contact_email>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <!--  TO DO: correct to not conflate categories and news room topics  -->
  <!--  Disquisition: it's funny how I write these TODOs and then never
         revisit them. It's as though the act of writing the thing down frees me
         from the responsibility to actually solve the problem. But what can I
         say? There are more problems than there's time to solve.  -->
  <links_related> </links_related>
  <files> </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>443951</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
      </field_categories>
  <core_research_areas>
      </core_research_areas>
  <field_news_room_topics>
      </field_news_room_topics>
  <links_related>
          <link>
      <url>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48098-0</url>
      <title></title>
      </link>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>443951</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[School of Psychology]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>1222</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[psychology]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>181975</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[cognitive mapping]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>181976</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[spatial navigation]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
