<node id="622399">
  <nid>622399</nid>
  <type>event</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27707"><![CDATA[27707]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1560190293</created>
  <changed>1560190293</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[PhD Defense by Patricia Angle]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p><strong>Area:</strong> IT Management</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Committee Members:</strong> Dr. Chris Forman (co-chair), Dr. Marco Ceccagnoli (co-chair), Dr. Sabyasachi Mitra, Dr. Eric Overby, Dr. Marius Niculescu</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Title:</strong> IT-Enabled Business Practices: Empirical Investigations of Productivity and Innovation</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Essay 1: <strong>Does IT Level the Playing Field for Small Establishments? Evidence from Manufacturing</strong></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>We examine whether information technology investments benefit from economies of scale. Using U.S. Census non-public microdata, we examine the productivity benefits of IT investments for over 11,000 manufacturing plants over a nine year period. We find evidence that large plants exhibit differential productivity benefits from IT investments relative to smaller plants. These differences are robust to a range of alternative estimators and cannot be explained by cross-sectional variance in firm size, plant and firm age, and position in the supply chain. The results have important implications for small plants that firm-level studies have been unable to reveal.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Essay 2: <strong>The Interplay of Information Technology and R&amp;D and its Implications for Innovation</strong></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Throughout the innovative process, the management of information flows means ensuring both confidentiality from competitors and availability to collaborators. Heavy investment in R&amp;D signals the need for strong knowledge management capabilities, which can be helped or hindered by investment in information technologies. Thus far, the complementarity or substitutability of IT and R&amp;D is unclear. This study investigates this relationship across industries using Harte-Hanks and Compustat data over the time period 2004-2008. We find that, on average, IT and R&amp;D are substitutes. This result is robust across a number of empirical settings.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></body>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[IT-Enabled Business Practices: Empirical Investigations of Productivity and Innovation]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_time>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[2019-06-21T12:30:00-04:00]]></value>
      <value2><![CDATA[2019-06-21T14:30:00-04:00]]></value2>
      <rrule><![CDATA[]]></rrule>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_time>
  <field_fee>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_fee>
  <field_extras>
      </field_extras>
  <field_audience>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Faculty/Staff]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Public]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Graduate students]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Undergraduate students]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_audience>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_phone>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_phone>
  <field_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
            <attributes><![CDATA[]]></attributes>
    </item>
  </field_url>
  <field_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_email>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>221981</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Graduate Studies]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>1788</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Other/Miscellaneous]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>100811</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Phd Defense]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
