<node id="620752">
  <nid>620752</nid>
  <type>event</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27707"><![CDATA[27707]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1555959479</created>
  <changed>1555959479</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[MS Proposal by Heather A. Handy]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p><strong>Name:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Heather A. Handy</strong></p>

<p><strong>Master&rsquo;s Thesis Proposal Meeting</strong><br />
<strong>Date:</strong>&nbsp;Wednesday, May 1, 2019<br />
<strong>Time:</strong>&nbsp;12:00pm<br />
<strong>Location:&nbsp;</strong>J.S. Coon Building, room 148<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Advisor:</strong><br />
Susan Embretson, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Thesis Committee Members:</strong><br />
Susan Embretson, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)<br />
Rick Thomas, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)<br />
Michael Hunter, Ph.D. (Georgia Tech)<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Title:&nbsp;</strong><strong>A Study of a Fit Index for Explanatory Item Response Theory Models</strong></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Abstract:&nbsp;</strong>Applying explanatory item response theory (IRT) models, such as the linear logistic test model (LLTM; Fischer, 1973) is advantageous when designing and selecting items. Likelihood ratio chi square tests for nested models are typically used to determine model significance.&nbsp; Multiple correlations of item difficulties estimated with the explanatory predictors are often used to provide further information about model quality.&nbsp; However, this approach is not statistically justifiable, since the effective sample size becomes the number of items. A simulation study was conducted to compare an explanatory item response theory fit statistic, &Delta; (Embretson, 1997; 2016), to traditionally used fit indices (nested model likelihoods and limited information multiple correlations) for assessing model quality.&nbsp; Simulation conditions include varying test length, item difficulty and the number of predictors.</p>
]]></body>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[A Study of a Fit Index for Explanatory Item Response Theory Models]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_time>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[2019-05-01T13:00:00-04:00]]></value>
      <value2><![CDATA[2019-05-01T15:00:00-04:00]]></value2>
      <rrule><![CDATA[]]></rrule>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_time>
  <field_fee>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_fee>
  <field_extras>
      </field_extras>
  <field_audience>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Faculty/Staff]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Public]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Graduate students]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Undergraduate students]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_audience>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_phone>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_phone>
  <field_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
            <attributes><![CDATA[]]></attributes>
    </item>
  </field_url>
  <field_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_email>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>221981</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Graduate Studies]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>1788</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Other/Miscellaneous]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>166866</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[MS Proposal]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
