<node id="593377">
  <nid>593377</nid>
  <type>event</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27707"><![CDATA[27707]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1499699668</created>
  <changed>1499699668</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[PhD Proposal by Andrew T. Bellocchio]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ph.D. Thesis Proposal</strong></p>

<p>by</p>

<p>Andrew T. Bellocchio</p>

<p>(Advisor: Prof. Daniel Schrage, Committee Members: Prof. Dimitri Mavris, Dr. Vitali Volovoi)</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Balancing Maintenance Free Operating Period Rotorcraft with Cost Capability Analysis</strong></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>2:00 pm, Friday, July 28, 2017</p>

<p>Weber SST III</p>

<p>Collaborative Visualization Environment (CoVE)</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>ABSTRACT:</strong></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>For the past 50 years, the paradigm of on-condition rotorcraft maintenance has yielded to random failures and subsequent unscheduled maintenance that regularly disrupt flight operations.&nbsp; The British Ultra-Reliable Aircraft Pilot Program of the late 1990s introduced the paradigm of Maintenance Free Operating Period (MFOP) as a solution. &nbsp;An MFOP aircraft is a fault tolerant, highly reliable system that minimizes disruptive failures for an extended period of operations.&nbsp; After the MFOP, a single Maintenance Recovery Period (MRP) consolidates the repair of accrued faults and inspections in order to restore aircraft&rsquo;s reliability for the next MFOP cycle.&nbsp; An MFOP strategy provides assurance to the user that flight operations will continue without disruption for the duration of the MFOP at a given survivability rate.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>The U.S. Department of Defense recently adopted MFOP as its maintenance strategy for the next generation of rotorcraft named the Future Vertical Lift (FVL) Family of Systems.&nbsp; The U.S. military desires uninterrupted flight operations to enable a more expeditionary force that operates from remote, austere bases.&nbsp; An initial goal of a 100-flight hour MFOP at 90% availability will be necessary to support such deployments; yet, today&rsquo;s fleet has the system reliability to fly less than ten hours without significant repair at 75% availability.&nbsp; Beyond FVL, the military desires to transition to near-zero maintenance with an MFOP between 480 hours and 720 hours.&nbsp; The challenge presented is to achieve an order of magnitude improvement to meet the FVL target and set the conditions for near-zero maintenance while still remaining affordable.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>The goal of the proposed research is to measure the balance between capability, availability, dependability, and life cycle cost of an MFOP rotorcraft.&nbsp; It will utilize a Petri net-like state space in an integrated Discrete Event Simulation to model the MFOP, MRP, and their survivability as operational metrics.&nbsp; The work will identify which subsystem(s) limit the MFOP of an aircraft and which components drive MRP higher.&nbsp; It will explore the relationship between MFOP and MRP as well as their cost and vehicle performance implications.&nbsp; It will test the hypothesis that an operational commander has some control over MFOP by varying the MRP through an aggressive lifing policy.&nbsp; Ultimately, the work will demonstrate an application of Cost Capability Analysis to inform decision makers on vehicle design and technology trade decisions in a near-zero maintenance context.</p>
]]></body>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[BALANCING MAINTENANCE FREE OPERATING PERIOD ROTORCRAFT WITH COST CAPABILITY ANALYSIS]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_time>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[2017-07-28T15:00:00-04:00]]></value>
      <value2><![CDATA[2017-07-28T17:00:00-04:00]]></value2>
      <rrule><![CDATA[]]></rrule>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_time>
  <field_fee>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_fee>
  <field_extras>
      </field_extras>
  <field_audience>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Faculty/Staff]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Public]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Graduate students]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <value><![CDATA[Undergraduate students]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_audience>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_phone>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_phone>
  <field_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
            <attributes><![CDATA[]]></attributes>
    </item>
  </field_url>
  <field_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_email>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>221981</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Graduate Studies]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>1788</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Other/Miscellaneous]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>102851</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Phd proposal]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
