<node id="592613">
  <nid>592613</nid>
  <type>external_news</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="34434"><![CDATA[34434]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1497280645</created>
  <changed>1497287958</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[A New Study Says Good-Looking Scientists Are Perceived To Be Inferior Scientists]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p>People can think you&#39;re a good-looking scientist. But can they also think you&#39;re&nbsp;a <em>good</em> scientist? A&nbsp;new <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/114/23/5970.long">study</a> from some UK researchers shows that survey respondents are interested in hearing more about what&nbsp;attractive, articulate scientists are doing in their labs than about those whom they believed didn&#39;t fit that description. But those same respondents doubt&nbsp;the quality of the pretty scientists&#39;&nbsp;work, all&nbsp;based solely on their looks.&nbsp;One of the scientists reacting&nbsp;to the&nbsp;study in this Forbes Science story&nbsp;is <a href="http://www.eas.gatech.edu/people/Kim_Cobb">Kim Cobb</a>, ADVANCE&nbsp;professor in the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Power Faculty Scholar&nbsp;and&nbsp;an oft-quoted expert on climate science and the health of coral reefs.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></body>
  <field_article_url>
    <item>
      <url><![CDATA[https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallshepherd/2017/06/10/a-new-study-says-good-looking-scientists-are-perceived-to-be-inferior-scientists/amp/]]></url>
      <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
    </item>
  </field_article_url>
  <field_publication>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[ Kausik Chakrabarti ]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_publication>
  <field_dateline>
    <item>
      <value>2017-06-10</value>
      <timezone></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_dateline>
  <field_media>
        </field_media>
  <og_groups>
          <item>1278</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[College of Sciences]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
    <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
