<node id="57607">
  <nid>57607</nid>
  <type>news</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="27279"><![CDATA[27279]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1205798400</created>
  <changed>1475895992</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[Margin of Victory Is Truer Indicator of Teams' Strength]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p>
</p><p><em>New York Times</em> - March 17, 2008<br />Column by Joel Sokol, associate professor at the Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering. The North Carolina Tar Heels had a good day Sunday. They beat Clemson for the Atlantic Coast Conference title, were at the top of the polls and were rewarded with the No. 1 overall seed in the N.C.A.A. men's tournament. They have plenty of momentum, not having lost in more than a month. But will they win the championship? Not in my bracket. . . .To test that hypothesis, we at the Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech took a four-year sample of college basketball results and extracted the thousands of games in which teams played each other twice during a season. If the purists are right, a team that beats an opponent once, even by only a point, should be more likely to win the rematch because the first victory (however small) shows that it is a better team.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/sports/ncaabasketball/17score.html?scp=1&amp;sq=sokol&amp;st=nyt">Read more&gt;&gt;</a></p>]]></body>
  <field_subtitle>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_subtitle>
  <field_dateline>
    <item>
      <value>2008-03-18T00:00:00-04:00</value>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_dateline>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_media>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[bchristopher@isye.gatech.edu]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_contact_email>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<strong>Barbara Christopher</strong><br />Industrial and Systems Engineering<br /><a href="http://www.gatech.edu/contact/index.html?id=bt3">Contact Barbara Christopher</a><br /><strong>404.385.3102</strong>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <!--  TO DO: correct to not conflate categories and news room topics  -->
  <!--  Disquisition: it's funny how I write these TODOs and then never
         revisit them. It's as though the act of writing the thing down frees me
         from the responsibility to actually solve the problem. But what can I
         say? There are more problems than there's time to solve.  -->
  <links_related> </links_related>
  <files> </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>57458</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item>
        <![CDATA[Engineering]]>
      </item>
          <item>
        <![CDATA[Research]]>
      </item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>145</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Engineering]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>135</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Research]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <core_research_areas>
      </core_research_areas>
  <field_news_room_topics>
      </field_news_room_topics>
  <links_related>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>57458</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[ISyE External News]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_keywords>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
