<node id="53803">
  <nid>53803</nid>
  <type>news</type>
  <uid>
    <user id="15436"><![CDATA[15436]]></user>
  </uid>
  <created>1266829994</created>
  <changed>1475895785</changed>
  <title><![CDATA[Thoreau’s Cabin Reconstructed at Georgia Tech]]></title>
  <body><![CDATA[<p>Georgia Tech Honors Program students’ examination of Henry
David Thoreau’s writings took a physical turn as School of Literature,
Communication and Culture Associate Professor Hugh Crawford’s class
reconstructed Thoreau’s famed cabin.&nbsp; </p><p>Using only the instructions recorded by the author in his
work, “Walden,” the class and numerous other students raised the cabin’s walls
and rafters this past Saturday on the lawn in front of the College of Architecture
Building.&nbsp; What began as a seminar
on the writings of Thoreau became a search for meaning beyond the analysis of
words on a page. </p><p>“We are searching for a greater understanding of Thoreau’s
experience at Walden and of knowledge embodied in practices and processes,”
said Honors Program student and builder Victor Lesniewski.&nbsp; “There is a case to be made for gaining
a perspective on the world—an additional context for meaning—through material
practices.&nbsp; It means understanding
that there is knowledge and intellect that cannot be represented through a
graph, a lecture, or a college classroom. It is a tacit knowledge that can only
be achieved through an interaction with the materiality of a tree, a tool, the
world.”</p><p>Students only used tools that would have been available to
Thoreau to recreate the famed cabin.&nbsp;
No nail guns, power saws, or pressure-treated two-by-fours—students used
felling axes, broadaxes, crosscut saws, adzes, chisels, augers and bores, chalk
lines, squares, froes, and mallets.&nbsp;
They also relied on Thoreau’s sparse instructions to guide them through
the building process.</p><p>“For all his prolixity regarding his house, Thoreau
provides little detail about the actual construction,” said Crawford.&nbsp; “All we know is that he went to the
woods in late March 1845, felled a number of white pines with his borrowed axe,
squared them—probably with a borrowed broadaxe—and constructed a 10-foot by
15-foot by 8-foot timber-frame with six-by-six beams joined by mortise-and-tenon
joints.”</p><p>Beginning in October, students began felling yellow pine
trees from a farm near Monticello and squaring them by hand, no small
undertaking considering each log weighed hundreds of pounds.&nbsp; Each mortise-and-tenon joint that
connects the beams took anywhere from 30 minutes to three hours to complete,
and the house has more than 20 joints.&nbsp;
The cabin’s beams require little storage space, stacking neatly together
in what could be considered an early version of flat-packing.</p><p>“Thoreau didn’t detail how much labor it took to build a
cabin like this,” Lesniewski said.&nbsp;
“In trying to figure out how he built this, we are gaining an experience
similar to Thoreau’s.”&nbsp; Also
informing the experience, Lesniewski added, were conversations prior to
construction. “We have conducted interviews with Thoreau scholars, timber
framers, and latter day Thoreaus to continue adding depth to our understanding,”
he said.</p><p>The result of the class’s innovative approach to research
yielded a new insight about the author.&nbsp;
“Many people see Henry David Thoreau as an anti-social crank who chose
to spend his time alone, counting ants or measuring the ice at Walden Pond,”
Crawford said. “While there is some truth in that perspective, the students
have also learned how many of his activities demanded community, particularly
the raising of his house.</p><p>“Thoreau spent many a long day squaring up large timbers,
pausing occasionally to talk with the casual passerby. But he also needed the
help of a good number of friends and townspeople to raise the frame, an
activity that requires team-work, patience, and good spirits, and is usually
accompanied by music, feasting, and all around good times.”&nbsp; Crawford observed this sense of
community first-hand.</p><p>Many students who were not enrolled in the class joined
the self-dubbed Thoreau Housing Collective, their interest piqued by the
ever-present crew of flannel shirt-clad Honors Program students working in
front of the Architecture Building.&nbsp;
Often spending their weekends and afternoons with Crawford working on
the cabin, more than 20 students from a wide range of colleges and majors
donated thousands of hours to the project.&nbsp; Many of them now find themselves with a new appreciation for
the craftsmanship and skills required to build a timber-framed house.&nbsp; “I had never even hammered before this,
now I love it,” said Honors Program student Sarah Mudrinich.</p><p>Students will hold a March 16 poster presentation of the
project during the Undergraduate Research Spring Symposium in the Student
Center Ballroom, and a student video about the project is in production.&nbsp; The Thoreau Housing Collective also has
documented its experience at <a href="http://www.thoreauhouse.org" target="_blank">www.thoreauhouse.org</a>, which includes
movies, pictures, journals, interviews, and research.</p><p>The cabin will be displayed on campus for an
indefinite amount of time.&nbsp; While
the ultimate fate of the structure is uncertain, the legacy of the project is
already making an impact across the country.&nbsp; High school students in Cincinnati used a Skype connection
to hear a lecture about the project and learn more about Thoreau.&nbsp; Plans for additional Skype lectures
around the country may be on the horizon.&nbsp;
In addition, Lesniewski plans to present a summary of the experience to
the American Literature Association in the coming months.</p>]]></body>
  <field_subtitle>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_subtitle>
  <field_dateline>
    <item>
      <value>2010-02-22T00:00:00-05:00</value>
      <timezone><![CDATA[America/New_York]]></timezone>
    </item>
  </field_dateline>
  <field_summary_sentence>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Honors Program's examination of Thoreau leads to new discovery about the author]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary_sentence>
  <field_summary>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[Honors Program's examination of Thoreau leads to new discovery about the author.]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_summary>
  <field_media>
          <item>
        <nid>
          <node id="53802">
            <nid>53802</nid>
            <type>image</type>
            <title><![CDATA[Thoreau 1]]></title>
            <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
                          <field_image>
                <item>
                  <fid>190081</fid>
                  <filename><![CDATA[Thoreau1.jpg]]></filename>
                  <filepath><![CDATA[/sites/default/files/images/Thoreau1_0.jpg]]></filepath>
                  <file_full_path><![CDATA[http://hg.gatech.edu//sites/default/files/images/Thoreau1_0.jpg]]></file_full_path>
                  <filemime>image/jpeg</filemime>
                  <image_740><![CDATA[]]></image_740>
                  <image_alt><![CDATA[Thoreau 1]]></image_alt>
                </item>
              </field_image>
            
                      </node>
        </nid>
      </item>
      </field_media>
  <field_contact_email>
    <item>
      <email><![CDATA[]]></email>
    </item>
  </field_contact_email>
  <field_location>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_location>
  <field_contact>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rebecca Keane</strong>, Ivan Allen College Communications</p><p>404-894-1720</p>]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_contact>
  <field_sidebar>
    <item>
      <value><![CDATA[]]></value>
    </item>
  </field_sidebar>
  <field_boilerplate>
    <item>
      <nid><![CDATA[]]></nid>
    </item>
  </field_boilerplate>
  <!--  TO DO: correct to not conflate categories and news room topics  -->
  <!--  Disquisition: it's funny how I write these TODOs and then never
         revisit them. It's as though the act of writing the thing down frees me
         from the responsibility to actually solve the problem. But what can I
         say? There are more problems than there's time to solve.  -->
  <links_related> </links_related>
  <files> </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>1183</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item>
        <![CDATA[Institute and Campus]]>
      </item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_categories>
          <item>
        <tid>129</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Institute and Campus]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_categories>
  <core_research_areas>
      </core_research_areas>
  <field_news_room_topics>
      </field_news_room_topics>
  <links_related>
          <link>
      <url>http://www.honorsprogram.gatech.edu/</url>
      <title></title>
      </link>
          <link>
      <url>http://www.lcc.gatech.edu/</url>
      <title></title>
      </link>
          <link>
      <url>http://www.thoreauhouse.org/</url>
      <title></title>
      </link>
      </links_related>
  <files>
      </files>
  <og_groups>
          <item>1183</item>
      </og_groups>
  <og_groups_both>
          <item><![CDATA[Home]]></item>
      </og_groups_both>
  <field_keywords>
          <item>
        <tid>8754</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Communication and Culture]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>479</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Green Buzz]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>4201</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[honors program]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>8755</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[Hugh Crawford]]></value>
      </item>
          <item>
        <tid>3747</tid>
        <value><![CDATA[literature]]></value>
      </item>
      </field_keywords>
  <field_userdata><![CDATA[]]></field_userdata>
</node>
